> On Aug 27, 2015, at 4:38 PM, Mark Adams <mfad...@lbl.gov> wrote: > > OK, I can put PetscRandom back into GAMG and add a check for DIVERGE_ITS in > the Cheby solve. Is that necessary and sufficient?
Branch? > > Mark > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > On Aug 27, 2015, at 2:15 PM, Jed Brown <j...@jedbrown.org> wrote: > > > > Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> writes: > >> Don't use drand48 directly; use PetscRandom. Matt promised to fix up > >> PetscRandom to use it by default and work on all systems so all you need > >> to do is use PetscRandom everywhere. > > > > Yes, that's what I meant. But we need a deterministic seed. > > Matt promised > > Its in 'next', > > -random_type rander48 > > Matt > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments > is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments > lead. > -- Norbert Wiener >
