Hi, I was traveling and did not have time to finish investigating, but there seems to be an issue with fortran get_command_argument and friends in mixed language mode. I will continue to investigate and will report back.
Blaise > On Sep 19, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Satish Balay <ba...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > [from the available logs] its not clear what the issue is. > > PETSc fortran interface attempts to use getarg_() and iargc_() [fortran > library functions] - or its variants - directly from C. > > This usage is non-standard and messy [and some compiler folks - said - > its unsupported usage]. > > Also - configure attempts to guess the fortran link libraries - and > constructs a link command cCompilerLibs + cxxCompilerLibs + > fortranCompilerLibs. > > Perhaps there is a bug in this detection code - thats triggering this > error. Its verifyable by attempting to use: > > --with-clib-autodetect=0 --with-clib-autodetect=0 --with-cxxlib-autodetect=0 > LIBS='liblist' > > where 'liblist' should be determined manually - for the linking of > C/fortran/CXX to work correctly. > > My fix attempts to call command_argument_count(), > get_command_argument() directly from fortran - and if that doesn't > work - then its likely a compiler bug.. > > [which one can try to replicate with a simple test code] > > Satish > > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Jeff Hammond wrote: > >> Please report this via premier.intel.com. >> >> Jeff >> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Blaise A Bourdin <bour...@lsu.edu> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am testing intel 16 compilers under mac OS, and notice that options >>> handling for all past and current versions of petsc is broken in fortran >>> (options are not parsed). >>> I narrowed it down to *argc at start.c:168 always being 0 when intel 16 is >>> used (but taking the right value using intel 15 or gcc 5), but I can’t find >>> my way through the multiple macros to figure out what is really the matter… >>> The problem does not seem to arise under linux with the same compilers. >>> >>> Any idea of what is going on? Any test I can run to help (I assume that >>> you don’t have a test box with the latest intel compilers)? Is it a petsc >>> bug or an intel bug? >>> >>> I use an up to date pets-dev master, and the configure.log file is >>> available at >>> https://filestogeaux.lsu.edu/public/download.php?FILE=bourdin/89329uFByT9 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Blaise >>> >>> -- >>> Department of Mathematics and Center for Computation & Technology >>> Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA >>> Tel. +1 (225) 578 1612, Fax +1 (225) 578 4276 >>> http://www.math.lsu.edu/~bourdin >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- Department of Mathematics and Center for Computation & Technology Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA Tel. +1 (225) 578 1612, Fax +1 (225) 578 4276 http://www.math.lsu.edu/~bourdin