Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> writes: > So are you proposing we have three options > KSPChebyshevEstEigSetRHSType() with (1) "use give rhs", (2) "use > random rhs", (3) "use hash scheme to produce same right hand side > independent of number of processes so long as the ordering stays the > same" or are you suggesting just bagging the random?
Bag random for sure. > or bagging also the right hand side and always just use the hash > scheme? I wouldn't have a problem with that. The only nice thing about using the RHS is that it doesn't depend on the ordering. > By just using the hash scheme we can remove some current code and > options which is always a good thing... if they provide no added > value then they should be removed. Yes.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
