On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/09/2016 11:48 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com > > <mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On 10/08/2016 11:50 PM, Satish Balay wrote: > > >> > > >> Do tests need internet by chance? > > > > > > Nope - but you might want to disable petscnagupgrade.py in > > lib/petsc/conf/rules > > > > > > How? > > > > > > Change the action for the chk_upgrade target to 'true' > > > > I hope that it's right: > That is not what I was talking about at all. It has chk_upgrade: -@PETSC_DIR=${PETSC_DIR} ${PYTHON} ${PETSC_DIR}/bin/petscnagupgrade.py which you change to chk_upgrade: -@true Matt > --- lib/petsc/conf/rules.orig 2016-07-24 19:18:20.000000000 +0200 > +++ lib/petsc/conf/rules 2016-10-09 12:09:20.632035457 +0200 > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ > user=`ls -l ${INSTALL_LIB_DIR}/$$LIBNAME.${SL_LINKER_SUFFIX} > | tr > -s ' ' | cut -d ' ' -f 3`; \ > echo "Libraries were built by user $$user; please contact > him/her > to have them rebuilt."; \ > printf > "******************************************************"${ > PETSC_TEXT_NORMAL}"\n" > ; \ > - false; \ > + true; \ > fi; \ > fi; \ > done > > PAPI disabled. > > Please, see the result of testing at the bottom of this log: > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ > sagitter/petsc/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00462741-petsc/build.log.gz > > -- > --- > Antonio Trande > mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org > http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter > GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A > Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ > > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener