On 31 July 2017 at 19:47, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 4:40 AM, Lisandro Dalcin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> What's the proper way of handling this? What would happens if someone
>> builds with CFLAGS=-Werror ? Should I write a ftn-custom wrapper by
>> hand to avoid potential issues? Maybe the fortran wrapper generation
>> infrastructure should re-define the PETSC_DEPRECATED macro to empty?
>
>    Can it be redefined in petsc/private/fortranimpl.h which is included for 
> all Fortran stub generation?
>

Yes, that should work.

However, I have an additional question: How are Fortran users supposed
to be notified about the deprecation?


-- 
Lisandro Dalcin
============
Research Scientist
Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences & Engineering (CEMSE)
Extreme Computing Research Center (ECRC)
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
http://ecrc.kaust.edu.sa/

4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
al-Khawarizmi Bldg (Bldg 1), Office # 0109
Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
http://www.kaust.edu.sa

Office Phone: +966 12 808-0459

Reply via email to