> El 18 dic 2017, a las 22:34, Karl Rupp <r...@iue.tuwien.ac.at> escribió: > > > >> > > This is related to a message I sent 2 years ago to petsc-maint >> "Inconsistent naming of one Lapack subroutine", where I advocated >> renaming LAPACKungqr_ --> LAPACKorgqr_. But that thread did not end >> up in any modification... >> > > >> > > I can't find the thread. I also do not understand the problem. >> Are you saying that the check succeeds but the routines is still >> missing? >> > >> > No, the opposite. The routines are there, but since configure >> decided (wrongly) that they are missing, the check would fail at run >> time complaining that the routines are missing. >> > >> > Ah. Why does the check fail? It does succeed for a number of them. >> I don't know the exact reason, but it has to do with the names of >> real/complex subroutines. I guess the test is checking for dungqr, >> which does not exist - it should check for either dorgqr or zungqr. >> Before that commit, there were only checks for "real" names, but >> after the commit there are a mix of real and complex subroutines. >> Now I really want to punch one of the LAPACK guys in the face. Which one... >> Karl, I think it is enough right now to change the complex names, like ungqr >> to orgqr as Jose suggests. Will this work for you? > > works for me, yes. > If possible, I'd like to preserve the auto-generated nature of this list. If > 'dungqr' is the only exception, then please adjust the list of tests > accordingly *and* add a comment to BlasLapack.py saying why 'dungqr' is > special. > > Best regards, > Karli >
I have created a pull request for this. https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/pull-requests/826/fix-test-for-missing-lapack-subroutines/diff Jose > > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Matt >> > >> > Jose >> > >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > >> > > Matt >> > > >> > > >> > > Jose >> > > -- >> > > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin >> their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to >> which their experiments lead. >> > > -- Norbert Wiener >> > > >> > > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ >> <https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their >> experiments lead. >> > -- Norbert Wiener >> > >> > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ >> <https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/> >> -- >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments >> is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments >> lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener >> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>