"Smith, Barry F." <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> writes:

>> I think the stuff that is currently called "MPIAIJ" should be refactored
>> to not depend on AIJ at all.  That is kind of necessary anyway if SELL
>> is going to be made to derive from AIJ without also maintaining
>> AIJ-format storage.  Once refactored, that stuff that is currentnly
>> called "MPIAJ" should be renamed to something that does not include the
>> substring "AIJ".
>
>    I think this is the plan.

Great!

Reply via email to