"Smith, Barry F." <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> writes: >> I think the stuff that is currently called "MPIAIJ" should be refactored >> to not depend on AIJ at all. That is kind of necessary anyway if SELL >> is going to be made to derive from AIJ without also maintaining >> AIJ-format storage. Once refactored, that stuff that is currentnly >> called "MPIAJ" should be renamed to something that does not include the >> substring "AIJ". > > I think this is the plan.
Great!