Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 12:26 AM Jed Brown via petsc-dev < > petsc-dev@mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> Patrick Sanan via petsc-dev <petsc-dev@mcs.anl.gov> writes: >> >> > I was going to say something similar to Matt; to me it is worth the 1.5x >> > redundancy in the data if I can just view the output file with "doing >> > anything special". I have also done something similar to what you're >> > describing with save states, and it works fine; weirdly it seems like >> much >> > higher overhead than it is, though. >> >> That overhead for 2D fields isn't a big deal for me, but how would you >> identify that three components should be interpreted as vectors? What >> if they are three chemical concentrations? Plotting as vectors would >> just be confusing in that case. >> > > In PyLith, we annotate solution fields with transformation properties like > this.
How do you "annotate" in a VTK file?