BTW: Here is some recent move of apache to github. 

[Some of the comments were questioning this move a form open source view point 
- but mention of gitlab  is mixed]

https://lwn.net/Articles/787057/

Satish

On Tue, 14 May 2019, Balay, Satish via petsc-dev wrote:

> Any such issues with gitlab?
> 
> We are looking at migrating current jenkins tests to gitlab-ci. I
> believe some features are not available if repo is hosted at bitbucket
> or github. And in the future - some DOE ci utilities might be
> available for petsc via gitlab-ci.
> 
> [but yeah - hosting choice is more then just CI]
> 
> Satish
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 14 May 2019, Hapla Vaclav via petsc-dev wrote:
> 
> > I have the same feeling. Some parts are fast, e.g. browsing through the 
> > Source. But browsing branches, traversing commits, changing between 
> > branches etc. is getting a pain. And it's like that in the campus with 
> > super fast connectivity, so I believe it's a server-side issue.
> > 
> > Whereas GitHub seems to be quickly responding consistently across different 
> > sections. But I don't have that much experience with e.g. PRs there.
> > 
> > Plus the mobile version of BitBucket is just a _joke_, at least on both 
> > Firefox and Chrome I have on my android phone (yeah, who would nowadays use 
> > their cellphones to do some work while traveling, right?). For example PR 
> > Comments are virtually unreadable. Mainly on Chrome it is usually overlaid 
> > by the menu which I can't get rid of. This works better in Firefox but also 
> > there the thread is squeezed into a very narrow column, so for thread depth 
> > > 4 or so it becomes unreadable again. I usually give up and reply once I'm 
> > at my laptop but that really really sucks.
> > 
> > Vaclav
> > 
> > > On 14 May 2019, at 17:34, Smith, Barry F. via petsc-dev 
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  Could be they're digging their own grave.
> > > 
> > >  I seem to be spending more time waiting after each click when previously 
> > > I recall it was virtually instantaneous?
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 

Reply via email to