> On Jan 13, 2020, at 9:32 AM, Pierre Jolivet <pierre.joli...@enseeiht.fr>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> This is actually two separate questions, sorry.
> 1) I’m looking for the Fortran equivalent of the following, but I couldn’t
> get any help looking at the sources.
> ierr = PetscOptionsBegin(PETSC_COMM_WORLD,"","","");CHKERRQ(ierr);
> ierr = PetscOptionsFList("-mat_type","Matrix
> type","MatSetType",MatList,deft,type,256,&flg);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> ierr = PetscOptionsEnd();CHKERRQ(ierr);
These are based on C macros and have some funny arguments so would require
all custom Fortran stubs and interfaces. Sorry no one has written them.
> 2) I have Fortran tests which share the same outputs as my C tests. I want to
> use the same output_file, but my test has a separate output parameter. Is
> there someway to generate output_file dynamically?
> ! test:
> ! suffix: foo
> ! output_file: output/ex76_foo_bar-%D.out <— how to?
> ! nsize: 4
> ! args: -bar {{5 15}separate output}
> If it’s not possible in Fortran, but possible in C, I can switch things
> around of course.
>
> Thanks,
> Pierre
