And the monolithic/single issue aka#360 is very slow to access/browse.. Satish
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020, Jacob Faibussowitsch wrote: > > I think a special GitLab issue (something akin #360 CI Tracker) would do > > the job quite nicely. > I agree more with this. This also allows you to immediately see the list of > linked MR’s and issues right in the conversation, as well as being able to > link code snippets. One gripe however is that the issue becomes monolithic > with multiple conversation threads (as you can see the CI error issue is a > totally unstructured Smörgåsbord). To keep a more structured overview we > should have multiple issues that are linked together. > > Best regards, > > Jacob Faibussowitsch > (Jacob Fai - booss - oh - vitch) > Cell: (312) 694-3391 > > > On Jun 19, 2020, at 12:34 PM, Hapla Vaclav <vaclav.ha...@erdw.ethz.ch> > > wrote: > > > > I like Slack but it does NOT have the full history in the free plan - it's > > limited to 10k messages. > > > > I think a special GitLab issue (something akin #360 CI Tracker) would do > > the job quite nicely. > > > > Vaclav > > > >> On 19 Jun 2020, at 06:48, Jed Brown <j...@jedbrown.org> wrote: > >> > >> I would prefer this mailing list or GitLab issues because they are > >> > >> 1. genuinely open to external participants, > >> 2. more async-friendly for those in different timezones and folks with > >> young kids, and > >> 3. searchable and externally linkable (e.g., from merge requests and > >> issues) > >> > >> If we need synchronous breakouts, we could do so, but there should be a > >> summary back for those who couldn't participate synchronously. > >> > >> Barry Smith <bsm...@petsc.dev> writes: > >> > >>> I'd like to start a discussion of PETSc 4.0 aka the Grand > >>> Refactorization but to have that discussion we need to discuss what tool > >>> to use for that discussion. > >>> > >>> So this discussion is not about PETSc 4.0, please don't discuss it here. > >>> > >>> What do people recommend to use for the discussion > >>> > >>> * dedicated mailing list > >>> * slack channel(s) > >>> * zulip channel(s) > >>> * something else? > >>> > >>> I'd like a single tool that anyone can join at any time, see the full > >>> history, can attach files, search, not cost more money the we are already > >>> paying, etc. > >>> > >>> I expect this discussion to take maybe a week and then the actual > >>> discussion to take on the order of two months. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> Barry > >>> > >>> > > > >
