That is a good idea. Anyone against this? Thanks,
Matt On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 1:26 PM Barry Smith <bsm...@petsc.dev> wrote: > > Maybe something as simple for petsc-announce > > Subject: [Release] .... > Subject: [Job opening] .... > > Then when you send out the most recent job opening you can include in > the message something like > > "The PETSc announce mailing list will continue to be low volume. We > will now tag each message in the subject line with [Release], [Job > opening], or possibly other tags so you can have your mail program filter > out messages you are not interested in. > > Thanks for your continued support," > > > > On Nov 20, 2020, at 9:45 AM, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I got the second email in less than one month about sending a job opening > to the PETSc list. > > 1) Should we have some policy about this? > > I think we should encourage it, but in a way that does not produce noise > for people. I think there are no other good outlets for computational jobs. > > 2) Should we have a section of the website for this? > > I would like something that just selected some petsc-users mail from the > archive with a query in the URL. > > 3) If we encourage it, should we have a special header for job posts in > the mailing list? > > This would facilitate 2). > > Thanks, > > Matt > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their > experiments lead. > -- Norbert Wiener > > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ > <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/> > > > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>