On 2/10/07, Ben Tay <zonexo at gmail.com> wrote: > In other words, for my CFD code, it is not possible to parallelize it > effectively because the problem is too small? > > Is these true for all parallel solver, or just PETSc? I was hoping to reduce > the runtime since mine is an unsteady problem which requires many steps to > reach a periodic state and it takes many hours to reach it.
Can you describe your specific application and how are you solving it? As Barry said, your need-for-speed is not likely to be solved by running in parallel. -- Lisandro Dalc?n --------------- Centro Internacional de M?todos Computacionales en Ingenier?a (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnol?gico para la Industria Qu?mica (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient?ficas y T?cnicas (CONICET) PTLC - G?emes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594
