On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:49 PM, David Fuentes <fuentesdt at gmail.com> wrote:
> In 3.0.0-p4 > > PetscMalloc doesn't seem to return an error code if the requested memory > wasn't allocated ? Is this correct ? > > I'm trying to allocate a dense matrix for which there was not enough memory > and PetscMalloc is returning a null pointer but no errorcode to > catch. which is causing seg faults later. No, PETSc definitely returns an error code if the malloc fails. Matt > > thanks, > df > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20090323/bace8f71/attachment-0001.htm>