On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2011, at 10:35 PM, John Fettig wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>> ?If you pass in SAME_PRECONDITIONER to the KSPSetOperators() it is simply 
>>> impossible that it will rebuild the preconditioner. There must be another 
>>> explanation as to what is going on. Are you calling anything else on the 
>>> KSP?
>>
>> You are right. ?I was playing around with options and had set it to
>> SAME_NONZERO_PATTERN for the first iteration at each timestep to make
>> sure that would work (it does), and forgot to change it back.
>>
>> When it is actually set to SAME_PRECONDITIONER and I duplicate Amat to
>> Pmat and pass them to KSPSetOperators() before every KSPSolve, it
>> definitely uses the same preconditioner (as reported by -info), but
>> unfortunately it reverts back to the behavior I saw previously.
>
> ? What do you mean? Reverts back to? After some iterations? Copying the 
> matrix and passing it into KSPSetOperators() as the Pmat cannot make any 
> difference.

I mean that it doesn't make any difference, as you expect.

> ? Can you send us a code that reproduces the problem you think is happening 
> (petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov), I cannot get a consistent handle on the issue.

I will see what I can do.

John

Reply via email to