On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 23:18, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> I have not tried complex quad precision. If you are right than it may not > be possible right out of the box with std:complex. We are not in > position to provide a proper complex class for this case (for the same > reasons I listed before) so if someone wants PETSc with complex quad they > may have their work cut out for them. It's spelled __complex128. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.2/libquadmath.pdf Perhaps it's a shame they didn't use C99 complex __float128, but such is life. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120208/3f2dba2a/attachment.htm>
