Hong and Emil,
You will need to answer this.
> On Apr 15, 2015, at 6:24 AM, Dave Makhija <makhi...@colorado.edu> wrote:
>
> Barry,
>
> Is the method exact if I have a time dependent mass matrix (dF/dU_t changes
> each time step)? I'm not sure it's possible if TSSetIJacobian expects a
> function which computes the combination of dF/dU and a*dF/dU_t. But, perhaps
> there is something I'm missing.
>
> Otherwise, it looks very comprehensive. I like how you added the "cost
> integrand". If I recall correctly, the Trilinos package Rythmos is missing
> this.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dave
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:06 AM, Dave Makhija <makhi...@colorado.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm evaluating my options for computing time dependent adjoints. I did not
> > think PETSc supported this, but I see "TSAdjointSolve" in the development
> > branch. That would be fantastic news if you plan to support time integrated
> > adjoints!
> >
> > What features are envisioned and when is the targeted release date?
>
> Dave,
>
> We currently have discrete adjoint computations for explicit RK methods
> and for implicit theta methods (backward Euler and Crank-Nicholson). The
> development copy of the users manual has some discussion
> (http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-master/docs/manual.pdf page 135) and
> there are several examples. I urge you to try them out now in master and
> stay in contact with us to insure we provide what you need as we are actively
> developing them.
> We plan a release for early June.
>
> Barry
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Dave
>
>
