Re: [petsc-users] PCGASM in Fortran

[Luc Berger-Vergiat]

Ok,
I'll check PCASM instead.

Thanks

Best,
Luc

On 04/24/2015 02:42 PM, Dmitry Karpeyev wrote:

Unless you need subdomains that live on more than one processor, you should use PCASM. If you do need PCGASM, it is undergoing a major overhaul that will be ready in a couple of weeks.

Dmitry.

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:36 PM Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com <mailto:knep...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Luc Berger-Vergiat
    <lb2...@columbia.edu <mailto:lb2...@columbia.edu>> wrote:

        Hi all,
        I am trying to use the restricted additive Schwarz
        preconditioner for my problem but most of the fortran stub are
        not available for the functions related to domain
        decomposition (e.g. PCGASMSetSubdomains is not available so I
        can't assign subdomains).
        Is there a reason for this? Is there an easy work-around? Or
        should I just re-implement additive Schwarz in Fortran (that's
        not to hard in serial but I'm not sure about the parallel
        version).


    Can you just use PCASM, which has the all bindings?

      Thanks,

        Matt

        Thanks for your help!

-- Best,

        Luc

-- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their

    experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to
    which their experiments lead.
    -- Norbert Wiener