Richard, I haven't looked at it enough to have specific complaints :-)
Barry > On Dec 18, 2015, at 3:44 PM, Richard Mills <richardtmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Barry, > > Just curious: Do you have any particular recommendations for how you would > change the API? I am not a fan simply because the API is very "BLAS like". > I'm wondering if that is your primary objection, or if there is anything that > specifically sticks out as an annoyance. (I have yet to do any serious work > with these, so I don't know what I would find needs improvement.) > > --Richard > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Barry Smith <bsm...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > We're always happy to accept contributions. Intel unfortunately made some > terrible choices for APIs for these things so it is unlikely without a > specific funding source that we would ourselves add code to PETSc to utilize > them. > > Barry > > > On Dec 18, 2015, at 12:49 PM, W. Miah <wadud.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Do you have any plans for a PETSc port that uses the optimised Intel MKL > > sparse BLAS: > > > > https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/520797 > > > > I think this will be an interesting optimisation exercise. > > > > Best regards, > > > > -- > > web: http://miahw.wordpress.com > > mobile: +447905 755604 > > gpg: 4CC2 1A75 BDFB 2E29 B22F > >
