It helps if we have configure.log

   But if the non-batch version installed the Scalapack then why not just run a 
second time with the batch option; it should automatically use the scalapack 
that was already successfully installed. Send configure.log if it fails. 

   Barry

> On Dec 17, 2017, at 2:29 PM, Santiago Andres Triana <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear petsc-users,
> 
> I'm trying to install petsc in a cluster that uses a job manager.  This is 
> the configure command I use:
> 
> ./configure --known-mpi-shared-libraries=1 --with-scalar-type=complex 
> --with-mumps=1 --download-mumps --download-parmetis 
> --with-blaslapack-dir=/sw/sdev/intel/psxe2015u3/composer_xe_2015.3.187/mkl 
> --download-metis --with-scalapack=1 --download-scalapack --with-batch
> 
> This fails when including the option --with-batch together with 
> --download-scalapack:
> 
> ===============================================================================
>              Configuring PETSc to compile on your system                      
>  
> ===============================================================================
> TESTING: check from 
> config.libraries(config/BuildSystem/config/libraries.py:158)                  
>                          
> *******************************************************************************
>          UNABLE to CONFIGURE with GIVEN OPTIONS    (see configure.log for 
> details):
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unable to find scalapack in default locations!
> Perhaps you can specify with --with-scalapack-dir=<directory>
> If you do not want scalapack, then give --with-scalapack=0
> You might also consider using --download-scalapack instead
> *******************************************************************************
> 
> 
> However, if I omit the --with-batch option, the configure script manages to 
> succeed (it downloads and compiles scalapack; the install fails later at the 
> make debug because of the job manager). Any help or suggestion is highly 
> appreciated. Thanks in advance!
> 
> Andres 

Reply via email to