On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, Manav Bhatia via petsc-users wrote: > > > > On Apr 8, 2019, at 2:19 PM, Stefano Zampini <stefano.zamp...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > You can circumvent the problem by using a sequential solver for it. There's > > a command line option in petsc as well as API that allows you to do so. > > -mat_mumps_icntl_13 1 > > Stefano, > > Do you know if there is a performance penalty to using this option as > opposed to fixing it with the patch?
If would suggest first trying both the fixes if see either of them work for you. Satish
