Karl O. Pinc wrote: > Are there any concurrency issues involved in > updating pf tables? Specifically, I'd like to > run 2 instances of ftp-proxy but it has no > options to allow the separate copies to update > separate tables.
In the case of ftp-proxy you mean anchors, right? It uses subanchors that are named as follows: "ftp-proxy.$pid.$session" Where $pid is the process id of ftp-proxy, and $session the ftp-proxy session sequence number. So multiple ftp-proxy's will never collide.
