Re: impossible condition?

[James Nobis]

while that clearly would fix the problem why did the problem not crop up
immediately?
 
> it's required to pass on lo0 with antispoof. This is crystal clear
> documented in the manpage, though unfortunately that was added after 3.2 was
> released.
> so just 
> 
> pass in  quick on lo0 all
> pass out quick on lo0 all
> 
> somewhere far up in your ruleset. before antispoof.
> 
>