Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:07:59PM +0100, Cedric Berger wrote:
Now that change could result in a missed skip-step optimization if there
are two identical AF_INET addresses loaded with a different values in
words 1-3. I've added some code in pf_ioctl to always zero words 1-3
when we load the ruleset, but I'm not sure if I've cached all occurences.
Don't worry about that, I'll verify that. You haven't seen the latest changes in that code, and the regress tests we added. It's still fresh, actually now I'm in the perfect condition to touch that part :)
Great!!! Do you think that "pf.c" code will continue to change a lot the following weeks? Cedric
