you are here! oh and the -current MAN page. the ALTQ man page should also work - Xavier's referrals outline what hadn't made the blending, but that isn't current ;)
>>>>there was some talk of starting a WIKI on PF rulesets, that would be a good place to look!<<<<<< but I think that hasn't happened yet - there are good examples peppered through this list - Daniel shares really well. and the timing of PF+ALTQ is confirmed in Daniel's kerneltrap.org 10.2002 interview - blended too late for 3.2. -----Original Message----- From: David Chubb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ALTQ Thanks. Updating to -current. We are using this for part of a testing environment to simulate some adverse network conditions so it doesn't have to be entirely stable. Is there a good place to go find what correct syntax for all the different ALTQ options? (And any gotcha's for the implementation under PF?) --David -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ALTQ looks like it made -current after the freeze on 3.2 - so get a 3.3 CD when they ship. didn't play with CVS so I could be wrong! but I don't think you could play with ALTQ+PF in 3.2, only -current. there are answers that shouldn't make you think...and lookup a purchase and cross reference it with a posting - depending on the phase of the moon. -----Original Message----- From: David Chubb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ALTQ Quick question: Is ALTQ implemented in the stable branch of 3.2? Or do I have to update to -current?
