On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Philipp Buehler - sysfive.com GmbH wrote: > >Well, it doesnt work out logically. { N, .. , M } expands >to NxM rules, if you negate it, this will always be true in >one way or the other.
you're forgetting that the addys can have different address families. ie host = "{ v4_ip, v6_ip }", and without inet/inet6 in a rule, this expands to an inet and an inet6 rule. wouldn't !{..} make sense in this context? perhaps a limited version that only allows a single v4 and a single v6 ip or block. > >pfctl doesnt start to think for you. :) apparently it does, since it wouldn't let me do this when i tried it, but i didn't want to bitch about something i could fix with one extra macro. > >this has been discussed to death already, check the archives, >please. !{..} will never be supported. > >ciao >-- > Philipp Buehler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://sysfive.com/ > sysfive.com GmbH - UNIX. Networking. Security. Applications. > Steilshooperstr. 184, 22305 Hamburg, Germany - GSM +49-179-1136646 >