On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:52:14PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:16:10PM +0100, Srebrenko Sehic wrote: > > This is cosmetics. However, whouldn't we get some performance increase > > if pf(4) didn't bother looking at packets (in certain situations) going > > 'out' at all? > > please show me where that tiny little state search is a problem in real world.
We want pf(4) to outperform those nifty FWSM/5Gbps firewall blades. No? ;)
