Daniel Hartmeier wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 07:49:52PM +1000, Damien Miller wrote: > >> Comments? > > I guess the additional two numbers don't bloat the state entry too much. > > I'm not doing any accounting, so I'm not sure if this is a problem, but > the numbers a:b will be relative to the direction of the state (as > compared to absolute incoming/outgoing). So if you parse the output, you > have to check the direction of the state. Might be somewhat annoying if > you just want total numbers of incoming bytes or such.
My intention is for more detailed, per-address accounting. Much along the lines of what Cisco NetFlow provided. I agree that this is overkill if one just wants to obtain a total count. Any problems with the diff itself? -d
