Hi,
I have a question of style and efficiency. If I use a table with a single element, say
table <multicast> const { 224/8 }
is it significant more expensive to in a rule than an explicit (or macro expanded)
224/8?
I understand the advantages of the table, especially as I begin to make exceptions
for specific multicast addresses. But is there any reason to avoid singleton tables?
Or any stylistic reason to favor them over macros?
I would assume that there would be some overhead when calling the radix tree code to match the table entry. Is it small enough to be negligible?
Thank you.
Best Wishes, Greg
Gregory Wright Antiope Associates LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
