On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 04:18, Paul Cusbish wrote: > My problem is with route-to. It seems to have no effect in my case. For the > record, I don't have any nat rules on this link - My suspicion is that the nat'd > link is "grabbing" the packet bound for the route-to gateway, but i'm probably wrong.
while it seems unrelated to the question at hand--if you don't have an outbound NAT for traffic exiting this interface, how is this supposed to work? is your LAN addressed with publicly-routed IP's? > my route-to line is as follows: > > pass in quick on xl0 route-to ($adsl_if $adsl_nexthop) inet proto tcp from > $workstation to any port 25 keep state > I can attach more rules if needed i think that would be beneficial. -j =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Faster, faster, you fool, you fool! -- Bill Cosby =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
