On 6/6/05, b h <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any possible way that this is a new change? > Because I swear, it worked before, and my pf.conf > didn't change. Seems strange that I would go in > there and remove all those zeros.... but I've done > some weird stuff before.
I've just had it pointed out that the pf man page does mention you can address all possible interfaces with the same driver using the driver name (using fxp for all of fxp0,fxp1,fxp2). So I'm certainly wrong with the lo <-> lo0 thing. I've never used shortcuts in my rulesets and I've never heard anything like an lo1 interface, so it jumped out to me as weird. > doing a google search, it se4ems that there has been a > lot of "pass quick on lo all" around.... maybe if > this is a change, should be added to the "following > current" page I just did some testing, and lo does work properly, although I personally don't think it should (although I understand why and how it does). My apologies for the red herring. -- Jon Simola Systems Administrator ABC Communications
