On 12:41, Sun 26 Jun 05, David Hill wrote:
> > David Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> nat on sis0 inet from ! sis0:0 to any -> (sis0)
> >
> > This sounds a bit too inclusive for my tastes. I assume the address
> > range your DHCP deamon uses is known as well as the fixed addreses, so
> > why not use those instead, ie
> >
> > myranges = { 192.168.100.0/24, 192.168.101.0/24 }
> >
> > nat on $ext_if from $myranges to any -> ($ext_if)
> >
> > just my NOK 0.02
> >
> > --
> > Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
> > http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/
> > http://www.nuug.no/
> > "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"
> >
> >
>
> Well, I don't think I gave you all info.
>
> Lets say I have my box running with sis0 and ath0. sis0 has a public IP
> of 216.1.1.1. ath0 is running on private IP 10.0.0.1, serving DHCP for
> 10.0.0.0/24. But, lets say a person wanting to use the wireless hotspot
> has a static IP (public or private) set on his laptop and not set to use
> DHCP. Is there any possible way we could NAT his machine as well?
>
> The Cisco BBSM software could do it, but I cannot figure out how it worked.
Hi,
Some conference centers here do that.
They simply arp for all MAC addresses on the network and
that way the router sees an ip that is from your configured
lan. I know it's lame, but hey, it works
--
Michiel van Baak
http://michiel.vanbaak.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7E0B9A2D
"Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?"
