Dave Page wrote:>If it is all your own code then of course, you can do as you 
wish. But>as I pointed out, the base classes you said you were using 
were>originally based on other classes written by myself and others.I believed 
the intention of the Artistic License was not to prevent usage of parts of the 
code in closed source projects,but to prevent publication of code which looks 
like the original code and could cause confusion as to whatis the original 
work.Isn't this stated even more clearly in the 2.0 verision of the 
License?From http://www.perlfoundation.org/artistic_license_2_0:(8) You are 
permitted to link Modified and Standard Versions with otherworks, to embed the 
Package in a larger work of your own, or to buildstand-alone binary or bytecode 
versions of applications that includethe Package, and Distribute the result 
without restriction, providedthe result does not expose a direct interface to 
the Package.Regards,Knut

Reply via email to