unpacked zip. version is 8.4 should i build it from source? 2011/1/6 Ashesh Vashi <[email protected]>
> how did you install it? > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > > Ashesh Vashi > EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com> > > > > *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi> > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> the directory is there, but no gram.h. >> >> 2011/1/6 Ashesh Vashi <[email protected]> >> >> Do you have %PGDIR%/include/postgresql/server/parser directory which >>> contains gram.h? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks & Regards, >>> >>> Ashesh Vashi >>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL >>> Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com> >>> >>> >>> >>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Jasmin Dizdarevic < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> since this patch is applied, i can't build >>>> pgAdmin. %pgdir%\include\server\parser doesn't contain a gram.h file. >>>> What I'm doing wrong? >>>> >>>> Ty >>>> Jasmin >>>> >>>> 2011/1/5 Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 06:05, Ashesh Vashi < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Magnus Hagander <[email protected] >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 18:46, Ashesh Vashi < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Magnus/Dave, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This check-in has added one compilation error. >>>>>>>> The following line introduce an error in file '* >>>>>>>> pgadmin/db/keywords.c*' >>>>>>>> *#include <server/parser/gram.h> >>>>>>>> #include <server/parser/kwlist.h>* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Because - these header files does not always find under *`pg_config >>>>>>>> --includedir`* folder, but can be found under *`pg_config >>>>>>>> --pkgincludedir`*. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please find the patch to resolve the issue. This applies on both >>>>>>>> master and REL-1_12_PATCHES branch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looks good in general, but do we actually need to put it on 1.12? The >>>>>>> keyword build changes were only applied to master, so unless we actually >>>>>>> *need* it on the back branch, I don't think we should put it there. Is >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> needed for something else as well? >>>>>>> >>>>>> You're right. >>>>>> This patch should only be applied on master. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, confirmed and applied. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Magnus Hagander >>>>> Me: http://www.hagander.net/ >>>>> Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
