On Feb 21, 2011 3:29 PM, "Dave Page" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Nikhil. > > Are there any catalog changes with the refactoring, that change the > way parameters are represented that need to be reflected elsewhere in > pgFunction.cpp? > > Also, does anyone object to back-patching this? It's not a bug fix, > but it does mean that we don't support corresponding versions of PPAS > and PG in the same version of pgAdmin which seems undesirable.
I wasn't aware they were supposed to be? Is that new, or has it always been? More to the point - is this the only thing needed to reach compatibility? If so, i guess we can make an exception. If not, then there is no point without doing a bunch of more patches for other things, in which case i will object... The > patch is pretty straightforward and seems low risk. This is of course a prerequisite in either case? I also assume it affects only an edbas codepath? /Magnus
