Le 24/03/2011 11:21, Dave Page a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm looking at adding user mapping support. My first idea was to add >> them as children of foreign servers, but it doesn't seem this was a >> really good idea. They have no OIDs, no owners, no comments... geez, no >> nothing actually. They don't seem like objects, meaning they can't be in >> their own node (with no OID, refresh wouldn't work for example). > > They do have OIDs - and even without, refresh can be made to work > easily. We'd just need to refresh based on the unique key (umuser + > umserver). >
Don't remember what I did yesterday, but you're right. They have OIDs. That's good news. >> My second idea was to add a "User mapping" tab on the foreign server >> dialog, so that we could directly add user mapping to servers. It still >> seems a good idea to me. > > After thinking about it last night, I think the treeview is the > correct method. Add a user mappings node under the server. You're > correct in that is would be pretty simple, but that doesn't matter. I > would expect to see two tabs on the properties dialogue, one with OID > and username (and comment, if that is added in PG), and one with a > listview of key/value pairs for the options, in a similar layout to > the role/database variables tab. > Yeah, will do. -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
