On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 21:23 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 17:40 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 10:58 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > This patch adds support to a PostgreSQL 9.1 feature called security > > > labels. It adds a new tab to tables, columns, aggregates, domains, > > > foreign tables, functions, languages, sequences, types, and views > > > dialogs, that allows one to add security label for each provider they > > > want. I suppose most users will have only one provider, but the patch > > > supports multi providers. > > > > > > Note that this does not support a recent 9.2 feature of PostgreSQL that > > > adds security labels to global objects. This will be part of another > > > patch. > > > > > > > > > > Because of the latest push I did, it won't apply cleanly. There is one > > small issue which will be easy to fix. > > > > While working on it, I thought I would better look at the same time at > supporting security labels for global/shared objects. So, here are two > patches. The first one is a revised version of the previous patch. It > fixes the apply issue, and it deals better with connections. The second > one supports security labels for global objects. > >
Commited. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
