Is this tracked anywhere, or should I file a request?

On Thu, 8 Aug 2019, 15:03 Shaheed Haque, <shaheedha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Cool, thanks! I'll keep an eye out for it...
>
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 12:40, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:31 PM Shaheed Haque <shaheedha...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've had a quick look, and while I see the odd reference to PyPi in the
>>> archives, I'm not sure if there has ever been discussion of having a PyPi
>>> release for pgAdmin.
>>>
>>> I am of course aware of the packaging changes w.r.t. psycopg2 and
>>> psycopg2-binary in 4.6, but did wonder if that might open the door in that
>>> regard?
>>>
>>> This is of interest to me because when we deploy, we cannot avoid a
>>> dependency of PyPi for lots of stuff. But right now, in addition to that,
>>> we also manually maintain a dependency on a handful of packages such as
>>> pgAdmin. This in variably means we fall behind on these, and on balance,
>>> the minimal extra exposure to Pypi wuld be much preferable. I suspect that
>>> there are others in a similar position.
>>>
>>> So, any thoughts on making pgAdmin4 available on PyPi??
>>>
>>
>> Yes, but I just never got round to figuring out all the details. It's on
>> my personal TODO list.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>

Reply via email to