On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Avi Blackmore <supp...@satshot.com> wrote: > Hi, just got back to the office. Thanks for the response! > > On Nov 8, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Dave Page wrote: > >>> Given the size of the pg_class result set, this strikes me as really, >>> really inefficient. Perhaps these options could be queried in one go, by >>> joining against the main query for the listing of tables and other objects? >> >> I've attached a patch that attempts to do exactly that. Are you able to test >> it? >> > > I installed a binary image for my MacOS X workstation. I'd have to > grab the source and build that. What's the version the patch applies > against? Current release?
I developed it against the master branch, but I suspect it'll apply to the 1.16 branch too, as I don't think anything has changed in the affected file in master only. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support
