Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> Aha, it makes sense. So the desired and expected behaviour is the >> one I am having when the slave node fails (query becoming the way >> pgpool-II realises a node is down, doing failover of that node, and >> executing the actual query on the rest of nodes). Correct? > > In this case you need to reconnect to pgpool-II since it disconnects > all the connections from clients to pgpool-II.
Including the one from the query that caused pgpool-II to realise that node was not reachable? Does not seem so as the query was apparently executed correctly. Given my system has web front-ends that create connections every time, it is not a problem for me. It's just fine. -- Jaume Sabater http://linuxsilo.net/ "Ubi sapientas ibi libertas" _______________________________________________ Pgpool-general mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
