I second that Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 19, 2008, at 8:23, [email protected] wrote: > No objections here. Actually, I don't see advantages of pgpool over > pgpool-II, so I think it's better to put effort on pgpool-II. > > Daniel > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tatsuo > Ishii > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 8:40 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Pgpool-general] termination of maintenance for pgpool > > Hi pgpool users, > > I would like to propose to terminate of maintenance for pgpool(not > pgpool-II). It seems there's no reason to continute to use pgpool, and > actually there are very few people who are still using pgpool. > And, of course, resource for developing is precious so I think it > would be more productive to focus on pgpool-II developement. > > Comments? suggestions? > -- > Tatsuo Ishii > SRA OSS, Inc. Japan > _______________________________________________ > Pgpool-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general > _______________________________________________ > Pgpool-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general _______________________________________________ Pgpool-general mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
