> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 13:27 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> > Tatsuo, >> > >> > Currently the recovery routine is called on the current master database, >> > and the parameters passed to it do not include the master database IP >> > address or hostname. Given that the way to provision a node with 9.1 >> > replication is via pg_basebackup, which MUST be run on the standby, this >> > makes writing a recovery script which actually works rather difficult >> > and unreliable. >> > >> > I really think that you need to look at restructuring how the recovery >> > call for new nodes works. What I would prefer is to have a script which >> > is called *on the pgpool server* itself, and not on the master node. >> > This script would be passed the master address and the standby address; >> > I don't think it would need any other parameters. >> >> Maybe that is only true for streaming replication. I would think about >> how to deal with pg_basebackup. BTW, I think the script would need >> user, password and port number at least. >> >> > If that's impossible for some reason, can we at least pass the master >> > address to the recovery script? Working without it is unnecessarily >> > difficult. >> >> That would be easy. I would do it for 3.1. > > I thought the idea was to work on 9.1 for 3.2. Anyway, if we keep adding > things to 3.1, it will never be released.
I've been waiting for French, Germany translations are coming. I hoped these are included in 3.1. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp _______________________________________________ Pgpool-general mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
