> > > I've been reading the patch which allow pgPool-II to handle calls to > > > now() when pgPool-II is in replication mode. This is quite interesting. > > > Nevertheless, I was wondering why random() did not get the same treament. > > > Is there issues with it? > > > > There's no technical reason why we can't do this. If there's enough > > demand, we will implement it. > > OK. I'm for it. But I suppose one is not enough :)
Just out of curiousity, what are the use cases for random()? Maybe for generating test data? -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
