Hi! Thanks Guillaume for such a quick feedback :)
Guillaume Lelarge a écrit : >> I assumed the "i" index in the loop could be used to find from node 0 to >> nodecount... Hope this is always true ? >> > > Yes, you're right. Cool :) I read quite all the code to find the info... And I assumed that. Next step is to add a new column about Read/Write or Read Only status of the node. In Master/Slave mode it could be usefull to know who's the "master" (in case of a failback(.sh) it will be old_node+1 so, at the first failover it will be 0+1=1, the next will be 1+1=2, etc.. I *know* pgpool-II does only *assume* (am I right?) who's the master, but doesn't *yet* know for sure the master is in R/W ... because its all about the good execution of failback.sh (exit 0). If failback.sh succeeds, then pgpool-II *assumes* the n+1 is the new master... (am I still right?) So for the moment the column "Read-Write status" will only be based on what pgpool-II *assumes* to be... I think next step then is to be sure that the master is in R/W :) This completes the reflexion on the thread on pgpool-general whose subject is " Suggestion for Failover on Master/Slave Streaming Replication"... Now, digging back into pgpool-II code ;) Cheers, -- Jean-Paul Argudo www.PostgreSQL.fr www.Dalibo.com _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
