Sounds like a great idea. Could you send me the patches? -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
> Hi all, > > We have to connect some customers apps to PgPool II that use intensive > function call. The problem is that writting then all to > white_function_list or black_function_list is a pain to maintain. > > Instead we'd like to tell to the developers to always prefix all write > functions with "write_" as we can use a simple regex in those > configuration directives as follow: > > black_function_list = 'nextval,setval,write_.*' > > Or in an other way if this is more easy to maintain in the apps add a > "read_" or "get_" prefix to all function that are doing read only > queries to PostgreSQL. And so we can write things like that: > > white_function_list = 'read_.*,get_.*' > > Do you think this is something that can be useful for PgPool II ? If so > I already have a patch for that, then you just have to let me know how > to send it to you. > > Thanks for your great work. > > Best regards, > > -- > Gilles Darold > http://dalibo.com > > _______________________________________________ > Pgpool-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
