On Thu, 5 Nov 1998, Lincoln Spiteri wrote:
> > > I have a rather large database as well (> 2 Meg of tuples). I thought
> > > my system was souped up enough: PII/400 MHz (100 MHz bus) 256 Meg SDRAM,
> > > 18 Gig SCSI harddrive, Red Hat Linux 5.1. However, my swap space (512
> > > Meg) is on the same harddrive as the database (albeit on a separate
> > > partition). It sounds like you are saying that this is a no-no.
> > >
>
> Hello,
>
> Small question, doesn't linux only use around 128 Megs tops for swap
> space? I thought I read this in a HOWTO somewhere.
If it does, I'll have to add that to my list of reasons why Linux
is a bad operating system :)
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
- seperate swap drive, was Re: [ADMIN] Speed problem Terry Mackintosh
- Re: seperate swap drive, was Re: [ADMIN] Speed ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: seperate swap drive, was Re: [ADMIN] Sp... Lincoln Spiteri
- Re: seperate swap drive, was Re: [ADMIN... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: seperate swap drive, was Re: [A... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: seperate swap drive, was R... Mateus Cordeiro Inssa
- Re: seperate swap drive, was Re: [ADMIN] Sp... G. Anthony Reina
- Re: seperate swap drive, was Re: [ADMIN... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: seperate swap drive, was Re: [A... Bruce Momjian
- Re: seperate swap drive, was Re: [ADMIN] Speed ... Kaj-Michael Lang
- Re: seperate swap drive, was Re: [ADMIN] Speed ... David Ben-Yaacov
- Re: seperate swap drive, was Re: [ADMIN] Sp... The Hermit Hacker
