Mike,
From a different perspective I toyed around briefly with the idea of
creating a user called "backup" that would merely have SELECT permissions
on all tables in all databases in order to perform a pg_dump or
pg_dumpall. This works fine for a pg_dump as it does a single database
at a time. The problem was that I couldn't figure out a way to
automatically set SELECT permissions for the backup user when a new table
was created in the database. You can't set a default value in the
pg_class table nor create a trigger on insert as it complains about
"can't modify a system catalogue". Maybe there is some other way to get
around that, and I would be more than happy to hear comments on this.
The other problem I found was that when using pg_dumpall it dumps all
the database usernames/passwords so the "backup" user would need select
permissions on pg_shadow which contains all of the usernames/passwords.
Well, I kinda quit right there as far as using this restricted "backup"
user for pg_dumpall because if it can select all users/passwords from the
database then storing this combination in a shell script/environment
variable isn't any more secure. Sure, it takes one more step to get ALL
usernames/passwords, but that doesn't seem to be worth the effort.
Thinking about it now and seeing a shell script somebody posted a little
while ago to do a vacuum and pg_dump it might not be such a bad idea to
go back to the "backup" user with SELECT only permissions on the tables.
Just not sure how to set the permissions on newly created tables by
default, maybe it just has to be manually.
I would greatly appreciate comments on this idea and if it is worth
anything. I've teetered back and forth for some time.
Tim Frank
Original Message dated 20/03/01, 6:48:08 AM
Author: Michael Ansley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: RE: [ADMIN] Backing up postgresql databases:
Is there any reason why programs like this could not be given a simple
properties file which contains the username and password. This file
could then be passed on the command line, but nobody (other than, say,
root, or postgres) would have access to it at all. I've seen a number of
systems use this type of solution, and although it appears superficially
useless (am I opening myself to be shot down or what ;-), the security of
the file system creates (as far as I can see) reasonable safety.
Just my ¬25...
MikeA
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thierry Besancon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: 20 March 2001 08:34
>> To: Tim Frank
>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Backing up postgresql databases
>>
>>
>> Dixit Tim Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (le Tue, 20
>> Mar 2001 00:14:11 GMT) :
>>
>> » Have your shell script do
>> »
>> » export PGUSER=username
>> » export PGPASSWORD=password
>> »
>> » before you run pg_dumpall in the same script. The
>> user/pass would most
>> » likely have to be a superuser to have access to all
>> databases (this is
>> » also not guaranteed depending on your pg_hba.conf). Make
>> the script
>> » read/execute by root but not by anyone else and it will
>> help a tiny bit
>> » with security.
>>
>> Using something like "ps -e" shows the environment variables so it is
>> as unsecure as giving the password on the commande line.
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of
>> broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>>
_________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be
privileged and/or copyright
material of Intec Telecom Systems PLC (or its affiliated companies). If
you are not an
intended or authorised recipient of this e-mail or have received it in
error, please delete
it immediately and notify the sender by e-mail. In such a case, reading,
reproducing,
printing or further dissemination of this e-mail is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful.
Intec Telecom Systems PLC. does not represent or warrant that an
attachment hereto is free
from computer viruses or other defects. The opinions expressed in this
e-mail and any
attachments may be those of the author and are not necessarily those of
Intec Telecom
Systems PLC.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
________________________________________________________________________
__
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
