On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Stephan Szabo wrote: > > > Is this a feature, a bug, or a change related to some other critical > > > functional capability of Postgres? I haven't found anything else that > > > meets our requirements here, and I can work around this annoyance if > > > required- but I'd rather be lazy. ;) > > > > Switching to numbers for tables and databases helped a few things > > (including for tables making it easier to rollback a drop table). > > There's a contrib item, oid2name which will print out a mapping > > of directory number to database name. The readme gives an example > > of using it with du. > > Uh, actually, only the readme in the current CVS has the example, 7.2.X > doesn't. I recommend getting oid2name from the snapshot/CVS and using > that. It has the newer readme and some changes to make the examples > display properly. Also see the new doc section for 7.3 on disk usage: > > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/diskusage.html My bad. I assumed that oid2name wasn't likely to have changed without actually checking. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
