On Thursday 05 December 2002 23:21, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane writes: > > I was going to add one for schemas, but \ds and \dS are already taken, > > and there was no good proposal for what to use instead. Any thoughts? > > \dschema > > Pretty soon we'll have too many things for 'c' as well, so maybe we should > go with full words.
I think this sounds like a good idea. as they would be much easier to remember if its a full word. You can always leave the 1 leave the 1 letter abbrevations in anyway and have both! I also notice that on the todo list is a job to turn all these into views. It might be worth doing that (should not be too difficult I think) plus they could then be used from other client programs. Strictly I think this meta information should have its own access methods in the sql standard because currently sql is a broken standard with out this meta infomation. Peter Childs ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])