"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > We need to think about whether this bug is serious enough to justify a > > quick 7.3.5 release. I'm leaning to the idea that it is not, because > > if it were, we'd have heard about it from the field before now. In > > pre-7.4 code there is only one instant in the lifespan of an index where > > the bug could occur, and then only if the index is created empty. > > Agreed, I don't think 7.3.5 is warranted, but it would have been nice to > get this in 7.3.4. Let's keep our eyes open for maybe a 7.3.5 later.
7.3.4 is already out, I agree that do a 7.3.5 build is not necessary. Regards Gaetano Mendola ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
